the environment on blast
December 13th, 2009

Tuvalu shows mettle at Copenhagen

December 9, 2009 - the day that "Copenhagen" beat out "Tiger Woods" in the rankings of hot search terms. Thank you, treehugger.com.

Ben Jervey is covering this story here and here.

Tuvalu, speaking for all of AOSIS (the Alliance of Small Island States, needs a legally-binding deal, and they want China, India, and other emerging economies to be factored into it. They’ve seen the science, run the numbers, and know that a world without limits on China’s and India’s emissions is a world in which they can’t survive.

In this meeting, Tuvalu spoke up early, asking for (again) a new contact group to discuss an amendment to the Kyoto Protocol, one that would lift emerging economic powers (and rapidly growing emitters) like China and India into their own category, with some responsibilities.  Obviously, China isn’t keen on this idea, preferring the current commitment-free arrangment. For a good 45 minutes, Tuvalu and China plead their cases, and a virtual roll-call emerged during which Parties took the floor for uncharacteristically brief comments of support. Lesotho: we support the Tuvalu proposal. Saudi Arabia: we support China’s proposal.

The US hasn’t been escaping pressure, either. Tuvalu’s lead negotiator Ian Fry led this morning’s plenary meeting  by calling out  the U.S. Senate and President Obama, urging “that the entire population of Tuvalu lives within 2 meters of sea level, that their very existence as a nation is at stake, and that he isn’t trying to embarrass anyone, cause trouble, or make a show, but merely serve the people of Tuvalu and protect their future.”

I’m cheering on Fry, for one. The Ocean State a whole lot riding on the projected rising sea levels. In this spring’s Projo article,  G. Wayne Miller describes the most optimistic real-life projection for the year 2100:

Buildings have been lost, roads displaced, parks submerged. Wells have gone bad, polluted by encroaching salt water. Septic systems have failed. Beaches and valuable coastal wetlands have disappeared. Even moderate storms now cause unprecedented damage as waves and surges at least 3 feet higher than nine decades before pack an unprecedented punch.

After the jump, learn about the effects on our shoreline here, and what protection is needed/anticipated. Read the rest of this entry »

by Libby Kimzey | Posted in Lobbying | No Comments » | Tags: , , , ,
October 28th, 2009

Newly Sitting Pretty in the Top 10

The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy just released the 2009 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, and along with New England neighbors Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont and Maine, we in Rhode Island are enjoying the view from the Top 10.

Project HeatSave takes advantage of National Grid rebates for programmable thermostats

Brown's Project HeatSave takes advantage of National Grid rebates for programmable thermostats

The ProJo newsblog reports:

According to a press release, the scorecard examines these six state energy efficiency policy areas: (1) utility-sector and public benefits programs and policies; (2) transportation polices; (3) building energy codes; (4) combined heat and power; (5) state government initiatives; and (6) appliance efficiency standards. States can earn up to 50 possible points in these six policy areas combined.

The Ocean State earned 27.5 points, and moved up two spots from last year. We held fairly well in the categories of Utility and Public Benefits Efficiency Programs and Policies (9th), Transportation, Building and Energy Codes, and Appliance Efficiency Standards. On the other hand, came up short in State Government Initiatives and Combined Heat and Power.

Within Utility and Public Benefits Efficiency Programs and Policies we did poorly in the Targets subcategory. The report notes that: “Rhode Island has a legislative requirement enacted for electric and gas utilities to acquire all cost-effective energy efficiency that costs less than new energy supply as the first priority resource, placing it first in a utility’s resource “loading order” and greatly increasing the role of energy efficiency in utility long-term planning.” This was implemented in ‘06, but with no approximate annual savings target in place.

As far as decoupling, we’re the only ones in the top 10 who do not have a like mechanism in place for either Electricity or Natural Gas (our neighbors all have both).  Luckily we do have performance incentives in place for both.

In Transit, we are lacking in State Transit Funding (surprise!) and in High-Efficiency Vehicle Consumer Incentives (is that a cue for PGR?). Happily we’re one of the 14 states who joined California in adopting some dope GHG Vehicle Emission Standards.

State Government Initiatives, one of my favs. The subcategories: Financial and Information Incentives (out of 3), Lead by Example: Building Requirements (out of 1), Lead by Example: Efficient Fleets (out of 1), RD&D (out of 2).
And RI? The score: 0 … 1 …. 1…. 0. Disappointing. But still a nice time to highlight Rep Dennigan/Senator DiPalma’s Green Buildings Act this year (House Bill 5355/ Senate Bill 232). requiring that all new state buildings and renovations meet LEED Silver, including schools.

Doesn't help much to blow it up, either.

Doesn't help much to blow it up, either. At least we have a clear view of how we stand against archrival states, Texas and Vermont.

For your viewing pleasure, a nearly illegible graphic. Are you more surprised that Texas beat us or that we’re 26 spots ahead of Vermont?

The report in its entirety is well organized and definitely worth a skim for those who’ve been talking about the rejuventation of RISCC and developing some ambitious climate change state legislation, in the vein of this years Global Warming Climate Solutions Act.

2009 House 5355 Dennigan
by Libby Kimzey | Posted in Energy, Lobbying | 2 Comments » | Tags: , , ,













Powered by Wordpress using the theme bbv1